Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) confers multiple drug resistance on cancer cells by acting as a plasma membrane localized ATP-dependent drug efflux pump. Currently, there is little information on the nature of the communication between the energy-providing nucleotide binding domains (NBDs) and the drug binding sites of P-gp to generate transport of substrate. Many substrates and modulators cause alterations in ATP hydrolysis, but what effect do the various stages of the catalytic cycle have on drug interaction with P-gp? Vanadate trapping of Mg.ADP caused a reversible decrease in the binding capacity of the transported substrate (3)H-vinblastine and the nontransported modulator (3)HXR9576 to P-gp in CH(r)B30 cell membranes. The non-hydrolyzable nucleotide analogue ATP-gamma-S also caused a reduction in the binding capacity of (3)H-vinblastine but not for the modulator (3)HXR9576. This indicates that signaling to the NBDs following binding of a nontransported modulator is different to that transmitted upon interaction of a transported substrate. Second, it appears that the binding of nucleotide, rather than its hydrolysis, causes the initial conformational shift in the drug-binding site during a transport cycle.
Martin et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: