Trapidil significantly reduced angiographic restenosis after PTCA compared to aspirin (24.2% vs 39.7%; P<0.01).
RCT (n=384)
Double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does trapidil reduce angiographic restenosis compared to aspirin in patients undergoing PTCA?
Trapidil significantly reduces angiographic restenosis and recurrent angina compared to aspirin after PTCA.
Absolute Event Rate: 24.2% vs 39.7%
p-value: p=<.01
BACKGROUND: Trapidil is an antiplatelet drug with specific platelet-derived growth factor antagonism and antiproliferative effects in the rat and rabbit models after balloon angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Studio Trapidil versus Aspirin nella Restenosi Coronarica (STARC) is a multicentric, randomized, double-blind trial to assess the effects of trapidil in angiographic restenosis prevention after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Patients received either trapidil 100 mg TID or aspirin at the same dosage at least 3 days before angioplasty and for 6 months thereafter. Coronary angiograms before PTCA, after PTCA, and at 6-month follow-up were quantitatively analyzed with manual calipers. Of the initial 384 patients recruited, 254 were evaluable for restenosis analysis (128 trapidil, 126 aspirin). Restenosis, defined as a loss of initial percent gain after PTCA of at least 50% (primary end point), occurred in 24.2% of the trapidil group and 39.7% of the aspirin group (P < .01). A similar result was obtained when restenosis per vessel was considered (trapidil, 23.3%; aspirin, 36.9%; P = .018). Clinical events at follow-up were similar in the two groups except that recurrent angina was significantly more frequent in the aspirin group, 43.7% versus 25.8% in the trapidil group (P < .01). Trapidil was well tolerated: only 6 patients had to discontinue the drug because of side effects, which was not different from the aspirin group. CONCLUSIONS: Trapidil reduces restenosis after PTCA at the dosage of 100 mg TID and favorably influences the clinical outcome thereafter.
“Die so definierte Restenoserate sei mit 24,2 Prozent in der Trapidil-Gruppe gegenüber der ASS-Gruppe mit 39,7 Prozent deutlich geringer gewesen”
Maresta et al. (Thu,) conducted a rct in Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (n=384). Trapidil vs. Aspirin was evaluated on Restenosis, defined as a loss of initial percent gain after PTCA of at least 50% (p=<.01). Trapidil significantly reduced angiographic restenosis after PTCA compared to aspirin (24.2% vs 39.7%; P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: