Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract One of the urgent questions in contemporary literatures is how to represent multicultural communities; should differences between groups be emphasized, or should their common “universal” features be highlighted? Finding a way of giving each group its own distinctive voice without simultaneously appropriating that voice remains a problem. This article aims to examine how the writing of Amitav Ghosh treats these problems in representing the encounter between different ethnicities and cultures.
Tuomas Huttunen (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: