Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the complex patterns that emerge when race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and gender are considered simultaneously in health care disparities research and to outline the needed research to understand them by using disparities in lung cancer risks, treatment, and outcomes as an example. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: SES, gender, and race/ethnicity are social categories that are robust predictors of variations in health and health services utilization. These are usually considered separately, but intersectionality theory indicates that the impact of each depends on the others. Each reflects historically and culturally contingent variations in social, economic, and political status. Distinct patterns of risk and resilience emerge at the intersections of multiple social categories and shape the experience of health, health care access, utilization, quality, and outcomes where these categories intersect. Intersectional approaches call for greater attention to understand social processes at multiple levels of society and require the collection of relevant data and utilization of appropriate analytic approaches to understand how multiple risk factors and resources combine to affect the distribution of disease and its management. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how race/ethnicity, gender, and SES are interactive, interdependent, and social identities can provide new knowledge to enhance our efforts to effectively address health disparities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David R. Williams
Brigham Young University
Emily Z. Kontos
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Harvard University
Health Services Research
Harvard University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Williams et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a103a53d13714ec96ff6a76 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01404.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: