Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Most contemporary intrastate military conflicts have a criminalized dimension: In various ways and to varying degrees they use smuggling networks and criminal actors to create and sustain the material basis for warfare. Despite its importance, the criminalized side of intrastate war and its legacy for postwar reconstruction is not a central focus of analysis in most scholarly accounts of armed conflict. A detailed examination of the Bosnian conflict illustrates the explanatory usefulness of a “bottom up,” clandestine political economy approach to the study of war and post-war reconstruction. Drawing on interviews with former military leaders, local and international officials, and in-country observers, I argue that the outbreak, persistence, termination, and aftermath of the 1992–1995 war cannot be explained without taking into account the critical role of smuggling practices and quasi-private criminal combatants. The article suggests the need for greater bridging and broadening of the study of security, political economy, and crime.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Andreas
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
International Studies Quarterly
John Brown University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Andreas (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11e17e5a604c357c21bb40 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00290.x