Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this article we extend the model of language evolution exemplified in Ringe et al. 2002, which recovers phylogenetic trees optimized according to a criterion of weighted maximum compatibility, to include cases in which languages remain in contact and trade linguistic material as they evolve. We describe our analysis of an Indo-European (IE) dataset (originally assembled by Ringe and Taylor) based on this new model. Our study shows that this new model fits the IE family well and suggests that the early evolution of IE involved only limited contact between distinct lineages. Furthermore, the candidate histories we obtain appear to be consistent with archaeological findings, which suggests that this method may be of practical use. The case at hand provides no opportunity to explore the problem of conflict between network optimization criteria; that problem must be left to future research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Luay Nakhleh
Donald A. Ringe
Tandy Warnow
Language
University of Pennsylvania
Rice University
California University of Pennsylvania
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nakhleh et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c86d5404a0bea592537 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0078
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: