A problem-based learning rehabilitation programme improved optimistic expectations of future quality of life and general condition compared to standard treatment, with no differences in SF-36 or SRH.
RCT (n=207)
randomised
Does a problem-based learning rehabilitation programme improve quality of life in patients <70 years of age with a recent event of coronary artery disease?
A problem-based learning rehabilitation program added to standard treatment for CAD patients improves specific global measures of future QoL expectations and general condition, though overall QoL improves similarly with standard care alone.
BACKGROUND: The aim of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is not only physical improvement but also increased quality of life (QoL). A CR programme based upon problem based learning (PBL) philosophy was developed, to achieve and apply new knowledge related to coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this paper was to evaluate the impact of the PBL programme on QoL. METHODS: 207 consecutive patients <70 years of age with a recent event of CAD were randomised to a PBL group (n=104) or a control group (n=103). In addition to standard treatment, the PBL patients participated in 13 group sessions during 1 year, where individual learning needs and behavioural changes were focused upon. QoL was measured by the Ladder of Life, Self-Rated Health (SRH), SF 36, and Cardiac Health Profile (CHP). RESULTS: Significant differences between the groups, favouring the PBL patients, were found by global instruments: more optimistic expectations of the future QoL and a better general condition. No differences were found by SRH, SF 36 or subscales of CHP, but QoL increased in both groups during the year. CONCLUSIONS: The main outcome was that QoL improved in both groups with some effects favouring the PBL programme.
Tingström et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Coronary Artery Disease (n=207). Problem-Based Learning (PBL) rehabilitation programme vs. Standard treatment was evaluated on Quality of Life (QoL). A problem-based learning rehabilitation programme improved optimistic expectations of future quality of life and general condition compared to standard treatment, with no differences in SF-36 or SRH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: