Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Research on group identification has shown it to be a surprisingly weak predictor of intentions to take large‐scale social action. The weak links may exist because researchers have not always examined identification with the type of group that is most relevant for predicting action. Our focus in two studies (one in Romania and one in Australia, both Ns = 101) was on opinion‐based groups (i.e. groups formed around shared opinions). We found that social identification with opinion‐based groups was an excellent predictor of political behavioural intentions, particularly when items measuring identity certainty were included. The results provide clear evidence of the role of social identity constructs for predicting commitment to social action and complement analyses of politicised collective identity and crowd behaviour. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ana‐Maria Bliuc
University of Dundee
Craig McGarty
Australian National University
Katherine J. Reynolds
Australian National University
European Journal of Social Psychology
Australian National University
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bliuc et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69daa792615cc0c8eaa3c702 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.334
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: