Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The default option of the Google Translator Toolkit (GTT), released in June 2009, is to “pre-fill with machine translation” all segments for which a ‘no match’ has been returned by the memories, while the Settings window clearly advises that “most users should not modify this”. To confirm whether this approach indeed benefits translators and translation quality, we designed and performed tests whereby trainee translators used the GTT to translate passages from English into Chinese either entirely from the source text, or after seeding of empty segments by the Google Translate engine as recommended. The translations were timed, and their quality assessed by independent experienced markers following Australian NAATI test criteria. Our results show that, while time differences were not significant, the machine translation seeded passages were more favourably assessed by the markers in thirty three of fifty six cases. This indicates that, at least for certain tasks and language combinations—and against the received wisdom of translation professionals and translator trainers—translating by proofreading machine translation may be advantageous.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ignacio González García
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Target International Journal of Translation Studies
Western Sydney University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ignacio González García (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1998bb60e90a7f5fea719d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/target.22.1.02gar