Recombinant human CTRP-1 prevented collagen-induced platelet aggregation in vitro and in vivo platelet thrombosis in nonhuman primates without altering bleeding times.
Does CTRP-1 prevent platelet thrombosis in preclinical models?
CTRP-1 demonstrates promising antiplatelet activity by blocking VWF binding to collagen, preventing thrombosis without increasing bleeding risk in preclinical models.
CTRP-1 is a novel member of the C1qTNF-related protein family containing family characteristic collagen and TNF-like domains and shows marked expression in vascular wall tissue. We observed that recombinant human CTRP-1 specifically bound to fibrillar collagen and blocked collagen-induced platelet aggregation. CTRP-1 completely or partially prevented VWF and GPVI-Fc4 binding to collagen, respectively. However, GPVI-Fc4 failed to compete for the binding of CTRP-1 to collagen. CTRP-1 had no effects on alpha(2)beta(1) integrin I-domain binding to collagen. Using whole human blood under flow at low and high shear rates, CTRP-1 prevented platelets from accumulating on a collagen-coated surface but had no effects on "platelet-rolling" on a surface coated with VWF. These data suggest that CTRP-1 prevents collagen-induced platelet aggregation by specific blockade of VWF binding to collagen. By using the Folts vascular injury model in nonhuman primates (Macaca fascicularis), we were able to demonstrate that CTRP-1 can prevent platelet thrombosis in vivo. This effect was achieved in the absence of changes in activated-clotting time (ACT) and template cut bleeding times, suggesting that CTRP-1 has promising antiplatelet thrombotic activity and most likely acts by pacifying the thrombogenic site of vascular injury.
Lasser et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Platelet thrombosis. Recombinant human CTRP-1 was evaluated on Platelet aggregation and thrombosis. Recombinant human CTRP-1 prevented collagen-induced platelet aggregation in vitro and in vivo platelet thrombosis in nonhuman primates without altering bleeding times.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: