Interactive real-time radialSSFP MR-imaging correctly detected 100% of cardiac masses compared to 57.1% with spiralGE, enabling accurate detection without cardiac or respiratory triggering.
Observational (n=15)
Blinded to clinical data
Does interactive real-time radialSSFP and spiralGE MR-imaging allow for accurate detection of cardiac masses compared to standard triggered cine MR-imaging in patients with cardiac masses?
Interactive real-time radialSSFP MR-imaging provides accurate and fast detection of cardiac masses without requiring cardiac or respiratory triggering, outperforming spiralGE.
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 57.1%
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiac and respiratory controlled MR-imaging is the gold standard for imaging of cardiac masses. However, this technique may be limited in patients with dyspnoe or arrhythmia. The aim of this study was the evaluation of an interactive MR-approach for the detection and localization of cardiac masses. METHODS: Interactive real-time spiral gradient-echo (spiralGE) and radial steady-state-free-precession (radialSSFP) MR-imaging was performed during free-breathing and without cardiac triggering in 15 patients with 14 intracardiac or paracardiac masses. Standard cardiac triggered segmented k-space breath-hold steady-state-free-precession cine MR-imaging was used as the reference MR-imaging technique. Two groups of investigators blinded to clinical data were ask to rank image quality and to identify cardiac masses on real-time MR-images. RESULTS: Image quality was superior using radialSSFP when compared with spiralGE. Using radialSSFP all masses were correctly detected while 6 of 14 masses were missed on spiralGE. Mean real-time MR-imaging time was less than 3 minutes for both techniques. CONCLUSION: Interactive real-time radialSSFP MR-imaging allows for accurate and fast detection of cardiac masses without the need of cardiac or respiratory triggering.
Spuentrup et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Intracardiac or paracardiac masses (n=15). Interactive real-time radial steady-state-free-precession (radialSSFP) MR-imaging vs. Interactive real-time spiral gradient-echo (spiralGE) MR-imaging was evaluated on Detection of cardiac masses. Interactive real-time radialSSFP MR-imaging correctly detected 100% of cardiac masses compared to 57.1% with spiralGE, enabling accurate detection without cardiac or respiratory triggering.