Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The Charter of the United Nations forbids discrimination on the basis of sex language or religion. Some of the delegations involved in drafting the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights felt that this short list of four nondiscrimination items was enough and should be repeated in the Others wanted to be more exhaustive. The matter was referred to the Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and the Protection of Minorities. This commission recommended that the article in the Declaration state that everyone is entitled to the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration without distinction of any kind such as race sex language political or other opinion property status or national or social origin. Everything after religion was added to the Charter list. A few objections were raised but nothing was deleted from the list. Instead the two items of color and were added to the Sub-Commissions recommendation. Article 2 of the Declaration is thus an expansion of the Charters mandate that the new world organization promote human rights for without discrimination. This theme of nondiscrimination runs through the deliberations about the Declaration and whatever disagreements there were about the various items on the list were minor. There was complete agreement that the article on nondiscrimination was a keystone of the Declaration and a gateway to its universality. If we take away someones race sex and opinions on various subjects information about his or her background about birth and present economic status what we have left is just a human being one without frills. And the Declaration says that the human rights it proclaims belong to these kinds of stripped-down people that is to without exception. As Mr. Heywood the Australian representative said logically discrimination was prohibited by the use in each article of the phrase every person or everyone. That is why the prohibition against discrimination is not repeated- -as it well might have been--with each article but is stated at the beginning and made applicable to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration. Given this opening prohibition against discrimination there is strictly speaking need for repetition. But that does not mean that the temptation was not there especially in the case of sex-based discrimination. Nor does it mean that the final product--a litany of the words everyone and no one--was arrived at without struggle. For there was a struggle especially in the case of womens rights. (excerpt)
Johannes Morsink (Wed,) studied this question.