Replacement of the Ascending Aorta and Aortic Valve with a Composite Graft

We reviewed our entire experience with composite graft replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve during a 63 month interval ending in December, 1979. Anuloaortic ectasia was the most common indication for operation, followed by aortic dissection (acute and chronic). Hospital mortality was 5% and was related to the preoperative functional status and the duration of intraoperative myocardial ischemia. Reoperation on the ascending aorta for reasons other than postoperative hemorrhage was required in five of the 82 hospital survivors (6%). By actuarial analysis, 90% of hospital survivors were free of any reoperation on the ascending aorta or aortic valve three years postoperatively, and 93% were free of reoperation related specifically to the composite graft. Pseudoaneurysms at the coronary ostia or distal aortic anastomosis were observed in five of 16 patients having postoperative angiography. One of the five patients has required reoperation. Follow-up has averaged 23.5 months (range: 0.2-60 months). Three year actuarial survival for the 86 patients was 81%, for 44 patients with anuloaortic ectasia was 88%, and for 31 patients with aortic dissection was 83%. Composite graft replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve is a satisfactory alternative to supracoronary graft replacement and aortic valve replacement. It offers the advantage of excluding all aneurysmal tissue from the aortic anulus to the innominate artery, thereby eliminating the potential for later development of aneurysms of the sinuses of Valsalva, a known complication of the supracoronary technique. It is the method of choice for patients with anuloaortic ectasia and cephalad displacement of the coronary ostia. It is suitable for many patients with acute or chronic dissection and for patients with sinuses of Valsalva aneurysms following previous operations on the ascending aorta or aortic valve.