Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Stroke in younger people is relatively common and frequently unexplained. While understanding of the causes of young stroke has improved, there remains uncertainty over the role of low-risk lesions such as a patent foramen ovale (PFO). The TOAST criteria are often used to describe stroke aetiology, but in younger people in whom PFOs are frequent, there is a very high proportion of cases attributed to cardiac embolism. The impact of using the newer A-S-C-O criteria on stroke aetiology was investigated. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ischaemic stroke were investigated and categorised by the TOAST and ASCO1 criteria. Stroke aetiology was presented and compared by the different classification systems. RESULTS: Of the 106 ischaemic stroke cases, by TOAST 6% were 'large artery atheroma', 11% 'small vessel occlusion', 28% 'cardioembolic', 22% 'other determined cause' and 33% 'undetermined cause'. The vascular territory and associated causes are presented. With the ASCO1 criteria, there were more cases of unclassified stroke (51.9 vs. 34.0%; p < 0.001) and fewer cases of cardiac embolism. Kappa ranged from 0.5 for 'undetermined aetiology' to 1.0 for both 'large artery atheroma' and 'other determined aetiology'. Younger cases (<45 years) were less likely to be either 'large artery atheroma' or 'small vessel occlusion'. CONCLUSION: Using the ASCO criteria, more patients fall into the undetermined group which more accurately reflects our current uncertainty regarding the pathogenic relevance of PFOs in this age group.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul Cotter
St. Luke's Hospital
Mark Belham
University of Cambridge
Peter J. Martin
Kaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center
Cerebrovascular Diseases
University of Cambridge
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cotter et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12b917310b7e25efa404f5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000334183