Cost-Effectiveness of a Program to Prevent Depression Relapse in Primary Care

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of a depression relapse prevention program in primary care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary care patients initiating antidepressant treatment completed a standardized telephone assessment 6-8 weeks later. Those recovered from the current episode but at high risk for relapse (based on history of recurrent depression or dysthymia) were offered randomization to usual care or a relapse prevention intervention. The intervention included systematic patient education, two psychoeducational visits with a depression prevention specialist, shared decision-making regarding maintenance pharmacotherapy, and telephone and mail monitoring of medication adherence and depressive symptoms. Outcomes in both groups were assessed via blinded telephone assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and health plan claims and accounting data. RESULTS: Intervention patients experienced 13. 9 additional depression-free days during a 12-month period (95% CI, -1. 5 to 29. 3). Incremental costs of the intervention were 273 (95% CI, 102 to 418) for depression treatment costs only and 160 (95% CI, -173 to 512) for total outpatient costs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 24 per depression-free day (95% CI, -59 to 496) for depression treatment costs only and 14 per depression-free day (95% CI, -35 to 248) for total outpatient costs. CONCLUSIONS: A program to prevent depression relapse in primary care yields modest increases in days free of depression and modest increases in treatment costs. These modest differences reflect high rates of treatment in usual care. Along with other recent studies, these findings suggest that improved care of depression in primary care is a prudent investment of health care resources.