September 1, 1948

Note on the “Correction for Continuity” in Testing the Significance of the Difference between Correlated Proportions

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Methods of correcting for continuity in tests of significance of the difference between correlated proportions are presented. These corrections should increase the range of usefulness of the formulas developed by McNemar (1).

Mark Helpful

Bookmark

Relay

Cite This Study

Allen L. Edwards (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d985488988aeabbe685982 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289261

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Contingency Tables Involving Small Numbers and the χ2 Test1934 · 1,277 citations
2Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or Percentages1947 · 4,285 citations
3On the Interpretation of χ 2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P1922 · 2,922 citations
4On the Application of the χ 2 Method to Association and Contingency Tables, with Experimental Illustrations1922 · 18 citations
5049: Bayes' Theorem and the Fourfold Table.1926 · 9 citations

Mark Helpful

Bookmark

Relay