Hypoxia increased exercise heart rate compared to normoxia despite combined β-adrenergic and muscarinic receptor inhibition (difference of 8.1 ± 7.6 beats/min).
Does hypoxia increase exercise heart rate despite combined inhibition of β-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in exercising subjects?
The tachycardic effect of hypoxia during exercise partially relies on vagal withdrawal and persists despite combined β-adrenergic and muscarinic receptor inhibition, potentially due to α-adrenergic transmission.
Absolute Event Rate: 8.1% vs 19.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
Hypoxia increases the heart rate response to exercise, but the mechanism(s) remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that the tachycardic effect of hypoxia persists during separate, but not combined, inhibition of β-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors. Nine subjects performed incremental exercise to exhaustion in normoxia and hypoxia (fraction of inspired O2 = 12%) after intravenous administration of 1) no drugs (Cont), 2) propranolol (Prop), 3) glycopyrrolate (Glyc), or 4) Prop + Glyc. HR increased with exercise in all drug conditions (P 0.4) but larger during Prop (3.4 ± 1.6 l/min, P = 0.004). Our results demonstrate that the tachycardic effect of hypoxia during exercise partially relies on vagal withdrawal. Conversely, sympathoexcitation either does not contribute or increases heart rate through mechanisms other than β-adrenergic transmission. A potential candidate is α-adrenergic transmission, which could also explain why a tachycardic effect of hypoxia persists during combined β-adrenergic and muscarinic receptor inhibition.
Siebenmann et al. (Fri,) reported a other. Hypoxia (12% O2) with propranolol and/or glycopyrrolate vs. Normoxia with no drugs was evaluated on Difference in heart rate between hypoxia and normoxia averaged over all workloads (p=<0.001). Hypoxia increased exercise heart rate compared to normoxia despite combined β-adrenergic and muscarinic receptor inhibition (difference of 8.1 ± 7.6 beats/min).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: