Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: To determine in patients with first ever stroke whether atrial fibrillation influences clinical features, the need to perform computed tomography, and prognosis. DESIGN: Observational cohort study with maximum follow up of 6.5 years. SETTING: Primary care, based on 10 general practices in urban and rural Oxfordshire. SUBJECTS: Consecutive series of 675 patients with first ever stroke registered in the Oxfordshire community stroke project. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of atrial fibrillation by type of stroke; effect of atrial fibrillation on case fatality rate and risk of recurrent stroke, vascular death, and death from all causes. RESULTS: Prevalence of atrial fibrillation was 17% (95% confidence interval 14% to 20%) for all stroke types (115/675), 18% (15% to 21%) for cerebral infarction (97/545), 11% (4% to 11%) for primary intercerebral haemorrhage (7/66), and 0% (0 to 11%) for subarachnoid haemorrhage (0/33). For patients with cerebral infarction the 30 day case fatality rate was significantly higher with atrial fibrillation (23%) than with sinus rhythm (8%); the risk of early recurrent stroke (within 30 days) was 1% with atrial fibrillation and 4% with sinus rhythm. In patients who survived at least 30 days the average annual risk of recurrent stroke was 8.2% (5.9% to 10.9%) with sinus rhythm and 11% (6.0% to 17.3%) with atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: After a first stroke atrial fibrillation was not associated with a definite excess risk of recurrent stroke, either within 30 days or within the first few years. Survivors with and without atrial fibrillation had a clinically important absolute risk of further serious vascular events.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Sandercock
University of London
John Bamford
Leeds General Infirmary
Martin Dennis
Oslo University Hospital
BMJ
Western General Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sandercock et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11f3980514fa642cccc97b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6867.1460