Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper extends the standard network centrality measures of degree, closeness and betweenness to apply to groups and classes as well as individuals. The group centrality measures will enable researchers to answer such questions as ‘how central is the engineering department in the informal influence network of this company?’ or ‘among middle managers in a given organization, which are more central, the men or the women?’ With these measures we can also solve the inverse problem: given the network of ties among organization members, how can we form a team that is maximally central? The measures are illustrated using two classic network data sets. We also formalize a measure of group centrality efficiency, which indicates the extent to which a group's centrality is principally due to a small subset of its members.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Martin G. Everett
Indian Health Service
Stephen P. Borgatti
University of Kentucky
Journal of Mathematical Sociology
Boston College
University of Greenwich
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Everett et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a030060f1675f581a755ec6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250x.1999.9990219
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: