Perivascular application of rapamycin significantly reduced the intimal area compared to control at 2 weeks after carotid injury (0.06 vs 0.2 mm2, P=0.016).
Does perivascular application of rapamycin, imatinib mesylate, or cysteamine reduce intimal hyperplasia in a rat carotid balloon injury model?
Perivascular delivery of rapamycin or imatinib mesylate using pluronic gel effectively attenuates intimal hyperplasia following carotid balloon injury in rats without causing medial thinning.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.06% vs 0.2%
p-value: p=0.016
PURPOSE: Inhibition of the intimal hyperplasia after vascular surgery is an important issue. The purpose of this study is to define whether perivascular application of rapamycin, imatinib mesylate or cysteamine can reduce intimal hyperplasia in a carotid balloon injury model. METHODS: Each drug was mixed with 40% pluronic gel solution and was topically applied over the injured carotid artery evenly. Two or four weeks after injury, the arteries were harvested and morphometric analysis was done. RESULTS: The medial areas were not significantly different in each group and a thinning of the media as a toxic drug effect was not observed in any treatment group. The intimal area and intima-to-media (I/M) ratio were significantly reduced in rapamycin-treated group and imatinib-treated group (P < 0.05). But cysteamine-treated group showed a trend of decrease in I/M ratio in 2 weeks, but no difference in 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: Perivascular delivery of imatinib or rapamycin with pluronic gel attenuated the development of intimal hyperplasia. But cysteamine did not. Further studies are needed to refine the optimal drug dosages in large animal models.
Park et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Intimal hyperplasia after carotid balloon injury (n=48). Rapamycin, imatinib mesilate, or cysteamine vs. Control was evaluated on Intimal area at 2 weeks (rapamycin group) (p=0.016). Perivascular application of rapamycin significantly reduced the intimal area compared to control at 2 weeks after carotid injury (0.06 vs 0.2 mm2, P=0.016).