Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
There is considerable uncertainty about how rates of soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling will change as CO 2 accumulates in the Earth's atmosphere. We summarized data from 47 published reports on soil C and N cycling under elevated CO 2 in an attempt to generalize whether rates will increase, decrease, or not change. Our synthesis centres on changes in soil respiration, microbial respiration, microbial biomass, gross N mineralization, microbial immobilization and net N mineralization, because these pools and processes represent important control points for the below‐ground flow of C and N. To determine whether differences in C allocation between plant life forms influence soil C and N cycling in a predictable manner, we summarized responses beneath graminoid, herbaceous and woody plants grown under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO 2 . The below‐ground pools and processes that we summarized are characterized by a high degree of variability (coefficient of variation 80–800%), making generalizations within and between plant life forms difficult. With few exceptions, rates of soil and microbial respiration were more rapid under elevated CO 2 , indicating that (1) greater plant growth under elevated CO 2 enhanced the amount of C entering the soil, and (2) additional substrate was being metabolized by soil microorganisms. However, microbial biomass, gross N mineralization, microbial immobilization and net N mineralization are characterized by large increases and declines under elevated CO 2 , contributing to a high degree of variability within and between plant life forms. From this analysis we conclude that there are insufficient data to predict how microbial activity and rates of soil C and N cycling will change as the atmospheric CO 2 concentration continues to rise. We argue that current gaps in our understanding of fine‐root biology limit our ability to predict the response of soil microorganisms to rising atmospheric CO 2 , and that understanding differences in fine‐root longevity and biochemistry between plant species are necessary for developing a predictive model of soil C and N cycling under elevated CO 2 .
Zak et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: