In STEMI patients without hemodynamic compromise, multivessel PCI was associated with a 30-day mortality of 2.8%, compared to 6.3% for IRA-only treatment and 1.3% for single vessel disease (P=0.023).
Cohort (n=745)
745 patients treated with primary PCI for STEMI within 24 hours, followed for a median of 597 days.
Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) vs Infarct related artery (IRA)-only treatment
30-day mortality (excluding cardiogenic shock or pulmonary edema), p=0.023
Absolute Event Rate: 2.8% vs 6.3%
p-value: p=0.023
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with multivessel disease (MVD), in relation to single or multivessel (MV)-PCI and to patients with single vessel disease (SVD). METHODS: Patients treated with PCI in the setting of <24 hr STEMI in the years 2004-2007 were considered. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-five primary PCI, 346 (46%) in patients with SVD and 399 (54%) in patients with MVD were performed. Among MVD patients, 156 (39%) had infarct related artery (IRA)-only treatment and 243 had MV-PCI: 147 (37%) in a single session, 48 (12%) within 24 hr, and 48 (12%) predischarge. Revascularization was complete in 46% of MVD patients. At a median follow-up of 597 days, mortality was 6.3% in SVD and 12% in MVD (P = 0.007), new revascularization 2.9% and 9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was 2.4% in SVD and 6.7% in MVD (P = 0.006). After exclusion of patients with cardiogenic shock or pulmonary oedema, more frequent in the MV-PCI in single session group (P = 0.006), 30-day mortality was SVD 1.3%, IRA-only 6.3%, MV-PCI 2.8% (P = 0.023), without differences if in a single (3.3%) or in staged session (2.2%). By multivariate analysis, female sex, anterior STEMI, cardiogenic shock, MVD, and procedural failure were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: STEMI patients with MVD have a worse prognosis than those with SVD. MV-PCI in patients without hemodynamic compromise yields good short-term results, even if performed very early, with a 30-day mortality in between that of SVD patients and that of MVD patients with IRA-only treatment.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elisabetta Varani
GTx (United States)
Marco Balducelli
Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna
Matteo Aquilina
Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Varani et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=745). Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) vs. Infarct related artery (IRA)-only treatment was evaluated on 30-day mortality (excluding cardiogenic shock or pulmonary edema) (p=0.023). In STEMI patients without hemodynamic compromise, multivessel PCI was associated with a 30-day mortality of 2.8%, compared to 6.3% for IRA-only treatment and 1.3% for single vessel disease (P=0.023).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a201bb0a05ff06c2ba1a540 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21722
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: