Carotid Endarterectomy Among Medicare Beneficiaries

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to examine the appropriateness and the surgical outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CE) in unselected community hospitals to identify opportunities for improvement. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all CEs performed on Medicare beneficiaries in Georgia in 1993 (n = 1945). Conclusions regarding appropriateness were based on current guidelines as interpreted by a physician reviewer and were supported by the aggregate results of structured, blinded overreading by clinicians with relevant expertise. Adverse outcomes were confirmed and rated as to severity by a physician. Outcomes were correlated with demography, vascular anatomic findings, comorbidity, surgical techniques, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: The majority of the patients (51%) were asymptomatic at presentation. CEs were performed appropriately in 96.1% of the cases in accordance with current guidelines. There was no significant difference in the rate of appropriateness between the symptomatic (96%) and the asymptomatic patients (96.4%). Survival without stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) was 94.3%. The 30-day mortality was 1.9%; moderate to severe strokes occurred in 1.8%, stroke-related death in 0.7%, MI in 1.1%, and MI-related death in 0.5%. Those hospitals performing or =1 had a risk for adverse outcomes 3.4 times higher than patients with a score of 0 after adjustment for age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: The great majority of CEs performed in Georgia on Medicare patients were appropriate, according to current guidelines. Slightly more than half of the patients were asymptomatic as defined in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. In hospitals performing <CEs in the index year, we noted higher morbidity and mortality, as well as an increase in less severe complications. This relationship between the volume of surgery and outcome was confirmed in the analysis of the 30-day mortality for all Medicare cases (n = 10,569) performed in Georgia from 1991 to 1995. This was the most important opportunity for improvement identified in this study. In view of the increased use of CE, it is important to continue to monitor the patterns of practice for this procedure to improve outcomes.