Next-generation sequencing of 29 adrenocortical carcinoma samples identified at least one genomic alteration in 76% of cases, with 59% having targets for available therapies or clinical trials.
Observational (n=29)
Does next-generation sequencing identify potential therapeutic targets in adrenocortical carcinoma?
Next-generation sequencing of adrenocortical carcinoma identifies actionable genomic alterations in over half of cases, suggesting new targeted therapy options.
AIMS: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) carries a poor prognosis and current systemic cytotoxic therapies result in only modest improvement in overall survival. In this retrospective study, we performed a comprehensive genomic profiling of 29 consecutive ACC samples to identify potential targets of therapy not currently searched for in routine clinical practice. METHODS: DNA from 29 ACC was sequenced to high, uniform coverage (Illumina HiSeq) and analysed for genomic alterations (GAs). RESULTS: At least one GA was found in 22 (76%) ACC (mean 2.6 alterations per ACC). The most frequent GAs were in TP53 (34%), NF1 (14%), CDKN2A (14%), MEN1 (14%), CTNNB1 (10%) and ATM (10%). APC, CCND2, CDK4, DAXX, DNMT3A, KDM5C, LRP1B, MSH2 and RB1 were each altered in two cases (7%) and EGFR, ERBB4, KRAS, MDM2, NRAS, PDGFRB, PIK3CA, PTEN and PTCH1 were each altered in a single case (3%). In 17 (59%) of ACC, at least one GA was associated with an available therapeutic or a mechanism-based clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS: Next-generation sequencing can discover targets of therapy for relapsed and metastatic ACC and shows promise to improve outcomes for this aggressive form of cancer.
Ross et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Adrenocortical carcinoma (n=29). Next-generation sequencing was evaluated on Presence of at least one genomic alteration. Next-generation sequencing of 29 adrenocortical carcinoma samples identified at least one genomic alteration in 76% of cases, with 59% having targets for available therapies or clinical trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: