Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AIMS: Morphological characteristics of non-significant coronary plaques (NSCPs) that develop rapid progression have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to clarify the morphological characteristics of NSCPs in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) using intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-three consecutive CAD patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled and 69 NSCPs (per cent diameter stenosis <50%) were identified on baseline angiogram. Baseline characteristics of NSCPs were evaluated by OCT, and patients were followed-up prospectively. At the second coronary angiography, the baseline OCT characteristics and plaque progression were correlated. During the 7-month follow-up period, 13 NSCPs showed angiographic progression and 56 NSCPs did not. Baseline minimum lumen diameter and diametric stenosis were similar between NSCPs with and without progression. Compared with NSCPs without progression, those with progression showed a significantly higher incidence of intimal laceration (61.5 vs. 8.9%, P < 0.01), microchannel (76.9 vs. 14.3%, P < 0.01), lipid pools (100 vs. 60.7%, P = 0.02), thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) (76.9 vs. 14.3%, P < 0.01), macrophage images (61.5 vs. 14.3%, P < 0.01), and intraluminal thrombi (30.8 vs. 1.8%, P < 0.01). Univariate regression analysis showed that TCFA and microchannel images showed high correlation with subsequent luminal progression odds ratio (OR): 20.0, P < 0.01 and OR: 20.0, P < 0.01, respectively. CONCLUSION: Optical coherence tomography-based complex characteristics of TCFA and microchannel were the potential predictors of subsequent progression of NSCPs in patients with CAD.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shiro Uemura
Interventional Cardiology
Kenichi Ishigami
Nara City Hospital
Tsunenari Soeda
Interventional Cardiology
European Heart Journal
Nara Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Uemura et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07f76f09b3c82015378d74 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr284
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: