Meeting ≥5 ideal cardiovascular health metrics compared with meeting none was associated with a 78% reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.10-0.50).
Cohort (n=7,622)
Yes
Cardiovascular health (n=7,622)
Meeting ≥5 ideal cardiovascular health metrics vs Meeting 0 ideal cardiovascular health metrics
All-cause mortality — HR 0.22 (0.10-0.50)
Effect estimate: HR 0.22 (95% CI 0.10-0.50)
BACKGROUND: Recently, the American Heart Association developed a set of 7 ideal health metrics that will be used to measure progress toward their 2020 goals for cardiovascular health. The objective of the present study was to examine how well these metrics predicted mortality from all causes and diseases of the circulatory system in a national sample of adults in the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used data from 7622 adults ≥20 years of age who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2002 and whose mortality through 2006 was determined via linkage to the National Death Index. For the dietary and glycemic metrics, we used alternative measures. During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 532 deaths (186 deaths resulting from diseases of the circulatory system) occurred. About 1.5% of participants met none of the 7 ideal cardiovascular health metrics, and 1.1% of participants met all 7 metrics. The number of ideal metrics was significantly and inversely related to mortality from all causes and diseases of the circulatory system. Compared with participants who met none of the ideal metrics, those meeting ≥5 metrics had a reduction of 78% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.50) in the risk for all-cause mortality and 88% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.57) in the risk for mortality from diseases of the circulatory system. CONCLUSION: The number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics is a strong predictor of mortality from all causes and diseases of the circulatory system.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Earl S. Ford
Northwestern University
Kurt J. Greenlund
Preventive Cardiology
Yuling Hong
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Circulation
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ford et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular health (n=7,622). Meeting ≥5 ideal cardiovascular health metrics vs. Meeting 0 ideal cardiovascular health metrics was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.50). Meeting ≥5 ideal cardiovascular health metrics compared with meeting none was associated with a 78% reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.10-0.50).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06f26b02b4a6d6a3d3d470 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.049122
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: