Dynamic pacing yielded a steeper restitution relation than standard pacing, accurately reproducing action potential duration dynamics and alternans during ventricular fibrillation.
Ventricular fibrillation and electrical alternans (n=26)
Dynamic pacing protocol vs Standard pacing protocol (Fixed pacing at short cycle lengths (100-300 ms))
Maximal slope of the restitution function
The restitution kinetics of action potential duration (APD) were investigated in paced canine Purkinje fibers (P; n = 9) and endocardial muscle (M; n = 9), in isolated, perfused canine left ventricles during ventricular fibrillation (VF; n = 4), and in endocardial muscle paced at VF cycle lengths (simulated VF; n = 4). Restitution was assessed with the use of two protocols: delivery of a single extrastimulus after a train of stimuli at cycle length = 300 ms (standard protocol), and fixed pacing at short cycle lengths (100-300 ms) that induced APD alternans (dynamic protocol). The dynamic protocol yielded a monotone increasing restitution function with a maximal slope of 1.13 +/- 0.13 in M and 1.14 +/- 0.17 in P. Iteration of this function reproduced the APD dynamics found experimentally, including persistent APD alternans. In contrast, the standard protocol yielded a restitution relation with a maximal slope of 0.57 +/- 0.18 in M and 0.84 +/- 0.20 in P, and iteration of this function did not reproduce the APD dynamics. During VF, the restitution kinetics at short diastolic interval were similar to those determined with the dynamic protocol (maximal slope: 1.72 +/- 0.47 in VF and 1.44 +/- 0.49 in simulated VF). Thus APD dynamics at short coupling intervals during fixed pacing and during VF were accounted for by the dynamic, but not the standard, restitution relation. These results provide further evidence for a strong relationship among the kinetics of electrical restitution, the occurrence of APD alternans, and complex APD dynamics during VF.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marcus L. Koller
Rhön-Klinikum
Mark L. Riccio
Thermo Fisher Scientific (United States)
Robert F. Gilmour
Electrophysiology
AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Cornell University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Koller et al. (Sun,) conducted a other in Ventricular fibrillation and electrical alternans (n=26). Dynamic pacing protocol vs. Standard pacing protocol was evaluated on Maximal slope of the restitution function. Dynamic pacing yielded a steeper restitution relation than standard pacing, accurately reproducing action potential duration dynamics and alternans during ventricular fibrillation.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0863879a6c4ba6e6109892 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1998.275.5.h1635