Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Patients want to be able to communicate with their physicians by e-mail. However, physicians are often concerned about the impact that such communications will have on their time, productivity, and reimbursement. Typically, physicians are not reimbursed for time spent communicating with patients electronically. But under federal meaningful-use criteria for information technology, physicians can receive a modest incentive for such communications. Little is known about trends in secure e-mail messaging between physicians and patients. To understand these trends, we analyzed the volume of messages in a large academic health system's patient portal in the period 2001-10. At the end of 2010, 49,778 patients (22.7 percent of all patients seen within the system) had enrolled in the portal, and 36.9 percent of enrolled patients (8.4 percent of all patients) had sent at least one message to a physician. Physicians in the aggregate saw a near tripling of e-mail messages during the study period. However, the number of messages per hundred patients per month stabilized between 2005 and 2010, at an average of 18.9 messages. As physician reimbursement moves toward global payments, physicians' and patients' participation in secure messaging will likely increase, and electronic communication should be considered part of physicians' job descriptions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Crotty et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1669a60f5dd46f564c5faa — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1145
Bradley H. Crotty
West Virginia University
Yonas Tamrat
Kaiser Permanente
Arash Mostaghimi
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Health Affairs
Harvard University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: