Frailty in cardiac surgery patients was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-3.0), institutional discharge (OR 6.3), and reduced midterm survival (HR 1.5).
Cohort (n=3,826)
No
Effect estimate: OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.0)
BACKGROUND: Frailty is an emerging concept in medicine yet to be explored as a risk factor in cardiac surgery. Where elderly patients are increasingly referred for cardiac surgery, the prevalence of a frail group among these is also on the rise. We assessed frailty as a risk factor for adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Functional measures of frailty and clinical data were collected prospectively for all cardiac surgery patients at a single center. Frailty was defined as any impairment in activities of daily living (Katz index), ambulation, or a documented history of dementia. Of 3826 patients, 157 (4.1%) were frail. Frail patients were older, were more likely to be female, and had risk factors for adverse surgical outcomes. By logistic regression, frailty was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.0), as well as institutional discharge (odds ratio 6.3, 95% CI 4.2 to 9.4). Frailty was an independent predictor of reduced midterm survival (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is a risk for postoperative complications and an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, institutional discharge, and reduced midterm survival. Frailty screening improves risk assessment in cardiac surgery patients and may identify a subgroup of patients who may benefit from innovative processes of care.
Lee et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in Cardiac surgery (n=3,826). Frailty vs. Non-frail patients was evaluated on in-hospital mortality (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.0). Frailty in cardiac surgery patients was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-3.0), institutional discharge (OR 6.3), and reduced midterm survival (HR 1.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: