Off-pump coronary bypass surgery aims to decrease perioperative morbidity by eliminating cardiopulmonary bypass, though concerns remain regarding the completeness of revascularization.
Does off-pump coronary bypass surgery improve perioperative and long-term outcomes compared to on-pump surgery?
This text provides a brief historical overview and rationale comparing off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery.
C oronary bypass surgery performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump surgery) has been used sporadically since the beginning of the bypass surgery era in 1967, but the use of this strategy increased dramatically during the 1990s.The major reason for the increased use of off-pump surgery was the hope that this strategy would decrease perioperative morbidity and possibly mortality by eliminating cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump surgery).The fear concerning off-pump surgery has been that the difficulty of operating with the heart beating would lead to less complete and less effective revascularization at the time of surgery and worse long-term outcomes.
Bruce W. Lytle (Mon,) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease requiring bypass surgery. Off-pump coronary bypass surgery vs. On-pump coronary bypass surgery was evaluated. Off-pump coronary bypass surgery aims to decrease perioperative morbidity by eliminating cardiopulmonary bypass, though concerns remain regarding the completeness of revascularization.