Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The authors examine the practice of dichotomization of quantitative measures, wherein relationships among variables are examined after 1 or more variables have been converted to dichotomous variables by splitting the sample at some point on the scale(s) of measurement. A common form of dichotomization is the median split, where the independent variable is split at the median to form high and low groups, which are then compared with respect to their means on the dependent variable. The consequences of dichotomization for measurement and statistical analyses are illustrated and discussed. The use of dichotomization in practice is described, and justifications that are offered for such usage are examined. The authors present the case that dichotomization is rarely defensible and often will yield misleading results.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robert C. MacCallum
University of California, Riverside
Shaobo Zhang
Hunan University
Kristopher J. Preacher
Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology
Psychological Methods
The Ohio State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
MacCallum et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1efd8e82f00b7c09203c0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: