Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Stereotype research emphasizes systematic processes over seemingly arbitrary contents, but content also may prove systematic. On the basis of stereotypes' intergroup functions, the stereotype content model hypothesizes that (a) 2 primary dimensions are competence and warmth, (b) frequent mixed clusters combine high warmth with low competence (paternalistic) or high competence with low warmth (envious), and (c) distinct emotions (pity, envy, admiration, contempt) differentiate the 4 competence-warmth combinations. Stereotypically, (d) status predicts high competence, and competition predicts low warmth. Nine varied samples rated gender, ethnicity, race, class, age, and disability out-groups. Contrary to antipathy models, 2 dimensions mattered, and many stereotypes were mixed, either pitying (low competence, high warmth subordinates) or envying (high competence, low warmth competitors). Stereotypically, status predicted competence, and competition predicted low warmth.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Susan T. Fiske
Amy J. C. Cuddy
Peter Glick
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
University of California, Los Angeles
Princeton University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fiske et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7419ab1cb92dd1bb8a3b6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: