Candesartan significantly reduced cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared with placebo (35.7% vs 41.3%; HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.90; P<0.001) in patients with CHF and LVEF ≤40%.
RCT (n=4,576)
double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does candesartan reduce cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure and LVEF <= 40%?
Candesartan significantly reduces mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction when added to standard therapies.
Effect estimate: HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.90)
Absolute Event Rate: 35.7% vs 41.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure (CHF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have a high risk of death and hospitalization for CHF deterioration despite therapies with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers, and even an aldosterone antagonist. To determine whether the angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan decreases cardiovascular mortality, morbidity, and all-cause mortality in patients with CHF and depressed LVEF, a prespecified analysis of the combined Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) low LVEF trials was performed. CHARM is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, international trial program. METHODS AND RESULTS: New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II through IV CHF patients with an LVEF of < or =40% were randomized to candesartan or placebo in 2 complementary parallel trials (CHARM-Alternative, for patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors, and CHARM-Added, for patients who were receiving ACE inhibitors). Mortality and morbidity were determined in 4576 low LVEF patients (2289 candesartan and 2287 placebo), titrated as tolerated to a target dose of 32 mg once daily, and observed for 2 to 4 years (median, 40 months). The primary outcome (time to first event by intention to treat) was cardiovascular death or CHF hospitalization for each trial, with all-cause mortality a secondary end point in the pooled analysis of the low LVEF trials. Of the patients in the candesartan group, 817 (35.7%) experienced cardiovascular death or a CHF hospitalization as compared with 944 (41.3%) in the placebo group (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.90; P<0.001) with reduced risk for both cardiovascular deaths (521 22.8% versus 599 26.2%; HR 0.84 95% CI 0.75 to 0.95; P=0.005) and CHF hospitalizations (516 22.5% versus 642 28.1%; HR 0.76 95% CI 0.68 to 0.85; P<0.001). It is important to note that all-cause mortality also was significantly reduced by candesartan (642 28.0% versus 708 31.0%; HR 0.88 95% CI 0.79 to 0.98; P=0.018). No significant heterogeneity for the beneficial effects of candesartan was found across prespecified and subsequently identified subgroups including treatment with ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, an aldosterone antagonist, or their combinations. The study drug was discontinued because of adverse effects by 23.1% of patients in the candesartan group and 18.8% in the placebo group; the reasons included increased creatinine (7.1% versus 3.5%), hypotension (4.2% versus 2.1%), and hyperkalemia (2.8% versus 0.5%), respectively (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Candesartan significantly reduces all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with CHF and LVEF < or =40% when added to standard therapies including ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and an aldosterone antagonist. Routine monitoring of blood pressure, serum creatinine, and serum potassium is warranted.
Young et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=4,576). candesartan vs. placebo was evaluated on cardiovascular death or CHF hospitalization (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.90, p=<0.001). Candesartan significantly reduced cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared with placebo (35.7% vs 41.3%; HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.90; P<0.001) in patients with CHF and LVEF ≤40%.