Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
An important task of the clinical microbiology laboratory is the performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of significant bacterial isolates. The goals of testing are to detect possible drug resistance in common pathogens and to assure susceptibility to drugs of choice for particular infections. The most widely used testing methods include broth microdilution or rapid automated instrument methods that use commercially marketed materials and devices. Manual methods that provide flexibility and possible cost savings include the disk diffusion and gradient diffusion methods. Each method has strengths and weaknesses, including organisms that may be accurately tested by the method. Some methods provide quantitative results (eg, minimum inhibitory concentration), and all provide qualitative assessments using the categories susceptible, intermediate, or resistant. In general, current testing methods provide accurate detection of common antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. However, newer or emerging mechanisms of resistance require constant vigilance regarding the ability of each test method to accurately detect resistance.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James H. Jorgensen
Mary Jane Ferraro
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Harvard University
Massachusetts General Hospital
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jorgensen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9fb6484371aa676a3c5ca — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/647952
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: