Beta-adrenergic receptor blockade increased the AV nodal recovery time constant from 47 msec to 62 msec (p<0.001), whereas isoproterenol decreased it to 38 msec (p<0.001).
Beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade significantly alter the functional properties governing the AV nodal response to heart rate changes, which may play a major role in the mechanisms of AV nodal reentrant arrhythmias.
Absolute Event Rate: 62% vs 47%
p-value: p=<0.001
Recent work has shown that alterations in the dynamic atrioventricular (AV) nodal response to changes in heart rate can significantly modify AV nodal function. The present study was designed to evaluate the nature and potential importance of sympathetic regulation of the rate-dependent properties of the AV node. Selective stimulation protocols and mathematical formulations were used to independently quantify AV nodal recovery, facilitation, and fatigue in 12 morphine-chloralose-anesthetized dogs. Vagal effects were prevented by bilateral vagal transection and intravenous atropine, and the sinus node was crushed to allow a broader range of pacing cycle lengths. In seven dogs with sympathetic nerves intact, beta-adrenergic receptor blockade increased the recovery time constant (tau rec) for the conduction of premature test beats from 47 +/- 2 (mean +/- SEM) msec (control) to 62 +/- 1 msec (p less than 0.001), whereas isoproterenol decreased tau rec to 38 +/- 1 msec (p less than 0.001). In addition, beta-blockade increased the maximum amount of rate-dependent AV nodal fatigue from 7 +/- 1 msec (at a cycle length of 198 +/- 9 msec control) to 17 +/- 2 msec (p less than 0.001). In five dogs with decentralized stellate ganglia, tau rec was decreased from 71 +/- 3 msec (control) to 57 +/- 4 msec and 48 +/- 2 msec (p less than 0.001 for each) by left stellate ganglion stimulation at 5 and 10 Hz, respectively. Maximum fatigue was similarly reduced from 16 +/- 1 msec (control) to 12 +/- 2 msec (p = NS) and 8 +/- 1 msec (p less than 0.01), respectively. Stellate ganglion stimulation, isoproterenol, and beta-blockade did not alter AV nodal facilitation. A mathematical model incorporating quantitative indexes of AV nodal function accurately accounted for tachycardia-dependent increases in the atrial-His activation interval, which were enhanced by beta-adrenergic receptor blockade and reduced by isoproterenol. Furthermore, this model showed that beta-adrenergic effects were increased by increasing heart rate, with the majority of the rate-dependent action being due to changes in the time course of AV nodal recovery. We conclude that beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation alters functional properties that govern the AV nodal response to changes in heart rate. These changes in functional properties alter the ability of the AV node to conduct impulses during tachycardia and, as such, could play a major role in the ability of sympathetic stimulation to promote and beta-adrenergic receptor blockade to prevent the occurrence of AV nodal reentrant arrhythmias.
Nayebpour et al. (Fri,) reported a other. Beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade vs. Control was evaluated on AV nodal recovery time constant (tau rec) (p=<0.001). Beta-adrenergic receptor blockade increased the AV nodal recovery time constant from 47 msec to 62 msec (p<0.001), whereas isoproterenol decreased it to 38 msec (p<0.001).