Use of an antibacterial envelope in high-risk patients was associated with a significantly lower rate of CIED infections compared to matched controls (0.4% vs 3%; OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.02-0.95; P=0.04).
Cohort (n=899)
Effect estimate: OR 0.13 (95% CI 0.02-0.95)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.4% vs 3%
p-value: p=0.04
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections has risen rapidly since 2004. A commercially available minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope has been associated with a low CIED infection rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing CIED infection rates in patients receiving an antibacterial envelope. METHODS: Prospectively applied criteria for use of the antibacterial envelope included ≥2 of the following: diabetes, renal insufficiency, anticoagulation, chronic corticosteroid use, fever or leukocytosis at the time of implantation, prior CIED infection, ≥3 leads (cardiac resynchronization therapy or abandoned leads), pacemaker dependence, or early pocket reentry. CIED infection rate was compared to a cohort of patients with matched risk factors and a CIED implanted prior to use of the antibacterial envelope. RESULTS: A total of 260 antibacterial envelopes were implanted from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012. The mean number of CIED infection risk factors was 2.8 ± 1.2. The control cohort (N = 639) was matched for mean number of CIED infection risk factors (2.8 ± 1.2), though individual risk factors differed. After a minimum of 90 days of follow-up, there was one CIED infection among patients who received an antibacterial envelope (0.4%), compared to 19 (3%) in controls (odds ratio 95% confidence interval 0.13 0.02-0.95, P = 0.04). This difference persisted after adjustment for covariates (0.09 0.01-0.73, P = 0.02) and propensity score matching (0.11 0.01-0.85, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients prospectively identified at high risk for CIED infection, use of a commercially available antibacterial envelope was associated with a marked reduction in CIED infections when compared to a matched control cohort.
Kolek et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection (n=899). Minocycline and rifampin impregnated antibacterial envelope vs. Matched control cohort with CIED implanted prior to envelope use was evaluated on CIED infection rate (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.95, p=0.04). Use of an antibacterial envelope in high-risk patients was associated with a significantly lower rate of CIED infections compared to matched controls (0.4% vs 3%; OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.02-0.95; P=0.04).