Combined epicardial and endocardial ablation in highly selected patients with HCM-related MMVT resulted in 78% freedom from recurrent ICD shocks over a median follow-up of 37 months.
Case Report (n=10)
Yes
Does combined epicardial and endocardial ablation prevent recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in patients with HCM-related MMVT?
Combined epicardial and endocardial ablation is a feasible and reasonably efficacious option for refractory monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in highly selected patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MMVT) is rare in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). There are limited data on the utility of catheter ablation for the treatment of MMVT in this population. This study details a series of case reports from multiple centers where combined epicardial-endocardial ablation was performed in a highly selected group of patients with HCM-related MMVT. METHODS AND RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 10 patients with HCM-related MMVT. Pericardial access was achieved using the percutaneous subxyphoid approach. Epicardial and endocardial ventricular 3D bipolar voltage maps were generated. Ablation sites were identified using a combination of entrainment, activation, late/fractionated potential, and pace mapping. Electrophysiological-identified epicardial scar was present in 8 (80%) patients, endocardial scar in 6 (60%), and no scar in 1 (10%). In the 5 patients with inducible, stable MMVT, 3 cases were successfully terminated with ablation from the epicardium and 1 from the endocardium. The case that failed catheter ablation required surgical cryoablation to abolish the incessant VT. In the remaining 5 patients, 4 underwent epicardial and endocardial ablation of sites with good pace maps and late/fractionated potentials. No ablation was performed in the remaining patient because of noninducibility and lack of identifiable scar. After 37±17 months (limits, 2 to 62 months; median, 37 months), the freedom from recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks was 78% (7/9 patients) in those who underwent ablation. CONCLUSIONS: In highly selected patients with HCM, combined epicardial and endocardial mapping and ablation is a feasible and reasonably efficacious option for MMVT if refractory to aggressive trials of antiarrhythmic drugs and antitachycardia pacing.
Dukkipati et al. (Thu,) conducted a case report in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (n=10). Combined epicardial and endocardial catheter ablation was evaluated on Freedom from recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Combined epicardial and endocardial ablation in highly selected patients with HCM-related MMVT resulted in 78% freedom from recurrent ICD shocks over a median follow-up of 37 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: