Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Measuring a change in the existence of disease symptoms before and after a treatment is examined for statistical significance by means of the McNemar test. When comparing two treatments, Feuer and Kessler (1989) proposed a two-sample McNemar test. In this article, we show that this test usually inflates the type I error in the hypothesis testing, and propose a new two-sample McNemar test that is superior in terms of preserving type I error. We also make the connection between the two-sample McNemar test and the test statistic for the equal residual effects in a 2 × 2 crossover design. The limitations of the two-sample McNemar test are also discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Jim Xiang (Wed,) studied this question.
Loading...
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Janssen (United States)
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.