Computer‐aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: Pattern recognition with an artificial neural network

We are developing a computer program for automated detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of a signal classifier based on a convolution neural network (CNN) approach for improvement of the accuracy of the detection program. Fifty-two mammograms with clustered microcalcifications were selected from patient files. The clusters on the mammograms were ranked by experienced mammographers and divided into an obvious group, an average group, and a subtle group. The average and subtle groups were combined and randomly divided into two sets, each of which was used as training or test set alternately. The obvious group served as an additional independent test set. Regions of interest (ROIs) containing potential individual microcalcifications were first located on each mammogram by the automated detection program. The ROIs from one set of the mammograms were used to train CNNs of different configurations with a back-propagation method. The generalization capability of the trained CNNs was then examined by their accuracy of classifying the ROIs from the other set and from the obvious group. The classification accuracy of the CNNs for the ROIs was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. It was found that CNNs of many different configurations can reach approximately the same performance level, with the area under the ROC curve (Az) of 0.9. We incorporated a trained CNN into the detection program and evaluated the improvement of the detection accuracy by the CNN using free response ROC analysis. Our results indicated that, over a wide range of true-positive (TP) cluster detection rate, the CNN classifier could reduce the number of false-positive (FP) clusters per image by more than 70%. For the obvious cases, at a TP rate of 100%, the FP rate reduced from 0.35 cluster per image to 0.1 cluster per image. For the average and subtle cases, the detection accuracy improved from a TP rate of 87% at an FP rate of four clusters per image to a TP rate of 90% at an FP rate of 1.5 clusters per image.