Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We evaluate the long-term test-retest reliability and procedural validity of phobia diagnoses in the UM-CIDI, the version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, used in the US National Co-morbidity Survey (NCS) and a number of other ongoing large-scale epidemiological surveys. Test-retest reliabilities of lifetime diagnoses of simple phobia, social phobia, and agoraphobia over a period between 16 and 34 months were K = 0.46, 0.47, and 0.63, respectively. Concordances with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) were K = 0.45, 0.62, and 0.63, respectively. Diagnostic discrepancies with the SCID were due to the UM-CIDI under-diagnosing. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that modification of UM-CIDI coding rules could dramatically improve cross-sectional procedural validity for both simple phobia (K = 0.57) and social phobia (K = 0.95). Based on these results, it seems likely that future modification of CIDI questions and coding rules could lead to substantial improvements in diagnostic validity.
Wïttchen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.