Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The generalizations developed by qualitative researchers are embedded in the contextual richness of individual experience. Qualitative data management strategies that depend solely on coding and sorting of texts into units of like meaning can strip much of this contextual richness away. To prevent this, some authors have recommended treating individual accounts as whole cases or stories, but whole cases are difficult to compare with one another when the goal of the research is to develop generalizations that represent multiple accounts. In this article, the authors describe the ways in which three different qualitative researchers combined across-case coding and sorting with a variety of within-case data management and analysis techniques to produce contextually grounded, generalizable findings.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lioness Ayres
Karen Kavanaugh
Kathleen A. Knafl
Qualitative Health Research
Yale University
University of Wisconsin–Madison
University of Illinois Chicago
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ayres et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d97c770d540cafc5835af9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303013006008
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: