Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine factors that influence vulnerability/resiliency of depressed young people to suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. METHOD: Data were gathered during a 21-year longitudinal study of a birth cohort of 1,265 New Zealand young people. Measures included: suicide attempt; suicidal ideation; major depression; childhood, family, individual and peer factors. RESULTS: Young people who developed major depression had increased rates of suicidal ideation (OR = 54: 95% CI 4.5-6.6) and suicide attempt (OR = 12.1; 95% CI 7.9-18.5). However, the majority of depressed young people did not develop suicidal ideation or make suicide attempts, suggesting that additional factors influence vulnerability or resiliency to suicidal responses. Factors influencing resiliency/vulnerability to suicidal responses included: family history of suicide; childhood sexual abuse; neuroticism; novelty seeking; self-esteem; peer affiliations; and school achievement. These factors operated in the same way to influence vulnerability/resiliency among those depressed and those not depressed. CONCLUSIONS: Vulnerability/resiliency to suicidal responses among those depressed (and those not depressed) is influenced by an accumulation of factors including: family history of suicide, childhood sexual abuse, personality factors, peer affiliations and school success. Positive configurations of these factors confer increased resiliency, whereas negative configurations increase vulnerability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David M. Fergusson
University of London
Annette L. Beautrais
Ministry of Health
L. John Horwood
University of Otago
Psychological Medicine
Christchurch Clinical Studies Trust
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fergusson et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10253d01be78fe81607ac5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291702006748
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: