Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence, nature and consequences of adverse events and preventable adverse events in Swedish hospitals. DESIGN: A three-stage structured retrospective medical record review based on the use of 18 screening criteria. SETTING: Twenty-eight Swedish hospitals. Population A representative sample (n = 1967) of the 1.2 million Swedish hospital admissions between October 2003 and September 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of admissions with adverse events, the proportion of preventable adverse events and the types and consequences of adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 12.3% (n = 241) of the 1967 admissions had adverse events (95% CI, 10.8-13.7), of which 70% (n = 169) were preventable. Fifty-five percent of the preventable events led to impairment or disability, which was resolved during the admission or within 1 month from discharge, another 33% were resolved within 1 year, 9% of the preventable events led to permanent disability and 3% of the adverse events contributed to patient death. Preventable adverse events led to a mean increased length of stay of 6 days. Ten of the 18 screening criteria were sufficient to detect 90% of the preventable adverse events. When extrapolated to the 1.2 million annual admissions, the results correspond to 105,000 preventable adverse events (95% CI, 90,000-120,000) and 630,000 days of hospitalization (95% CI, 430,000-830,000). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that preventable adverse events were common, and that they caused extensive human suffering and consumed a significant amount of the available hospital resources.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael Soop
National Board of Health and Welfare
Ulla Fryksmark
National Board of Health and Welfare
Max Köster
Mayo Clinic in Florida
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
National Board of Health and Welfare
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Soop et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f8186d13714ec96fe3c97 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzp025