Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The object of this paper is to show that there are no valid formal objections to the argument from design, so long as the argument is articulated with sufficient care. In particular I wish to analyse Hume's attack on the argument in Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and to show that none of the formal objections made therein by Philo have any validity against a carefully articulated version of the argument.
Richard Swinburne (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: