This review highlights the limitations and modest contributions of candidate gene approaches, specifically AGT and ENaC, in understanding human essential hypertension.
The candidate gene approach to understanding the genetics of human essential hypertension is discussed by analyzing the contribution of 2 genes, angiotensinogen (AGT) and epithelial amiloride-sensitive sodium channel (ENaC). From a large series of studies conducted in humans and animals, it appears that the AGT gene plays a significant but modest role in human blood pressure variance. Mutations of the beta- and gamma-ENaC subunits are responsible for Liddle's syndrome, but the implication of the 3 ENaC subunits in essential hypertension is still questionable. Several lessons can be learned from these studies and applied to other candidate genes in essential hypertension: (1) Many linkage or association studies have a limited statistical power; (2) The genetic findings may vary greatly according to the populations studied; (3) There is a need for better phenotyping of the hypertensive population; (4) The causal relationship between molecular variants and hypertension is and will be difficult to establish firmly; (5) The contribution of genetic studied in rodents to the molecular genetics of human hypertension must be re-examined; (6) Most molecular variants lead to a low attributable risk in the population or a low individual effect at the individual level; and (7) It is too early to propose dietary recommendations and specific drug treatment according to patients' genotypes.
Corvol et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: