Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper explores conditions that allow data to appear, to come into being, in both conventional and more radical approaches in empirical social science research. Conventional qualitative inquiry that uses a positivist ontology—even when it claims to be interpretive—treats qualitative data, words, as brute, existing independent of an interpretive frame, waiting to be “collected” by a human. However, a Deleuzo-Guattarian ontology that does not assume the subject/object binary might not think the concept data at all. The author resists recuperating data in the collapse of the old empiricism and is content to pause in the curious possibilities of a normative ontology that imagines a superior, affirmative, and experimental empiricism in which all concepts, including data, must be re-thought.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a122b0792637892a9a60029 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487862
Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre
Culture Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies
Georgia Department of Education
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: