Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The adsorption of sodium, chloride, and phosphate ions by allophane, imogolite, and halloysite has been studied in relation to the surface structure of the mineral samples. The high adsorption of phosphate (>200 μ mole/g) and chloride (10–30 meq/100 g at pH 4) by allophane is ascribed to the small particle size of allophane, its high surface area (∼800 m 2 /g), and the presence at the surface of Al-OH-Al groups and defect sites. In contrast, halloysite has a relatively large particle size and a Si-O-Si surface. Accordingly, the adsorption of phosphate (5–10 μ mole/g) and chloride (1 meq/100 g) by halloysite is very much lower as compared with allophane. Phosphate adsorption by halloysite is also related to particle morphology and the number of edge sites. Thus, a sample consisting entirely of spheroidal particles adsorbed only 5 μ mole/g at a solution concentration of 1 × 10 −4 M, whereas the tubular types of comparable surface area adsorbed 7–10 μ mole/g at the same concentration. This is because spheroidal halloysite particles have few, if any, edge sites at which phosphate can adsorb. The relative degree of order and hydration of halloysite, as indicated by infrared spectroscopy, also affects phosphate adsorption. However, this factor is apparently less important than particle morphology and surface structure. Although imogolite also has an Al-OH-Al surface, it contains relatively few defect sites where phosphate can adsorb. Consequently, much less phosphate (120 μ mole/g) was adsorbed as compared with allophane.
Theng et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: