Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Bracketing is a method used in qualitative research to mitigate the potentially deleterious effects of preconceptions that may taint the research process. However, the processes through which bracketing takes place are poorly understood, in part as a result of a shift away from its phenomenological origins. The current article examines the historical and philosophical roots of bracketing, and analyzes the tensions that have arisen since the inception of bracketing in terms of its definition, who brackets, methods of bracketing, and its timing in the research process. We propose a conceptual framework to advance dialogue around bracketing and to enhance its implementation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tufford et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d80f9c617ce96c42ae2b7e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010368316
Lea Tufford
Peter A. Newman
Qualitative Social Work
University of Toronto
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: