Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A pragmatic research philosophy is introduced that embraces mixed-method approaches to applied research questions. With its origins in the work of Peirce (1984), James (1907), Dewey (1931), and contemporary support from Rorty (1982, 1990,1991), pragmatism emphasizes the practical problems experienced by people, the research questions posited, and the consequences of inquiry. As a way to highlight applications of pragmatism in sport psychology, pragmatism is compared to constructivism and positivism in terms of philosophical underpinnings and methodological applications. The pragmatic researcher is sensitive to the social, historical, and political context from which inquiry begins and considers morality, ethics, and issues of social justice to be important throughout the research process. Pragmatists often use pluralistic methods during multiphase research projects. Exemplar design types are discussed that logically cohere to a pragmatic research philosophy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter R. Giacobbi
West Virginia University
Artur Poczwardowski
University of Denver
Peter Hager
York University
The Sport Psychologist
University of Florida
York University
SUNY Brockport
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Giacobbi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8d0eb17a1cc0598d189f0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.19.1.18
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: