Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The emergence of socially responsible investing has led to the development of a large number of methodologies for rating corporate social responsibility and to a growing body of research exploring the link between environmental and financial performance. Increased availability of information potentially generates an abundance of riches upon which to base investment decisions, but it also raises issues of commensurability, information overload, and confusion. Using a unique data set combining environmental ratings from three leading purveyors, we identify the principal components of corporate environmental performance. We find that two distinct factors—the environmental processes and practices implemented by firms, and the environmental outcomes they generate—explain 80% of the variance of the data. We also find corporate financial performance to be associated to process but not to outcome measures.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Magali A. Delmas
University of California, Los Angeles
Dror Etzion
University of Vermont
Nicholas Nairn-Birch
University of California, Los Angeles
Academy of Management Perspectives
University of California, Los Angeles
McGill University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Delmas et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d80ab1fc5937d393ae2c3c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0123